Botswana judicial reform referendum, 2001

Botswana
This article is part of a series on the politics and government of Botswana
Constitution
Government President Ian Khama Vice-President Mokgweetsi Masisi Cabinet
Parliament National Assembly Ntlo ya Dikgosi (House of Chiefs) Constituencies
Administrative divisions Districts Sub-districts
Elections Recent elections General: 2004 2009 2014 Political parties
Foreign relations Minister of Foreign Affairs Diplomatic missions Passport Human rights
Other countries Atlas

A referendum on judicial reform was held in Botswana on 3 November 2001, having been originally scheduled for 6 October, but later postponed.^[1] The referendum asked eight separate questions about judges and courts, all of which were approved, seven by a margin of over 70%. Voter turnout for the referendum was just 4.9%, with 22,600 votes from a total of 460,252 registered voters.^[2] The postponement of the referendum by the government, a legal challenge by the Tswana nationalist group Pitso Ya Batswana, and a call by the group for a boycott were all suggested as reasons for the low turnout.^[3] Pitso Ya Batswana claimed that the referendum was an attempt by the BaKalanga ethnic group, who are over-represented in the judicial system, to increase their hold over it.^[3]

Question I

The first question was regarding qualification of candidates to be appointed judges on the High Court:

Do you agree that, for a person to be appointed a Judge of the High Court, he must qualify and have been qualified to practice as an advocate or attorney for not less than 10 years, or being qualified to practice as an advocate or attorney, has taught law in a recognized university for not less than 10 years, or be a Chief Magistrate who has held that office for not less than 5 years?

The proposal was passed with a 74.2% approval.^[2]

Question II

The second question was regarding qualification of candidates to be appointed judges on the Court of Appeal:

Do you agree that, for a person to be appointed a Judge of the Court of Appeal, he must qualify and have been qualified to practice as an advocate or attorney for not less than 10 years, or being qualified to practice as an advocate or attorney, has taught law in a recognized university for not less than 10 years?

The proposal was passed with a 74.81% approval.^[2]

Question III

The third question was regarding a change in the designation of High Court judges:

Do you agree that the designation of High Court Judges as "Puisne Judges" be altered to "Judges"?

The proposal was passed with a 76.74% approval.^[2]

Question IV

The fourth question was regarding raising the retirement age of High Court and Court of Appeal judges:

Do you agree that the retiring age of the Judges of the High Court and Court of Appeal should be increased from 65 to 70?

The proposal was passed, although with only a 53.93% approval, far lower than any of the other questions.^[2]

Question V

The fifth question was regarding the nomination of members of the Judicial Service Commission:

Do you agree that the members of the Judicial Service Commission who are nominated by the Law Society or appointed by the President shall serve a renewable term of two years, and may be removed by the Commission in the first case and by the President in the second for inability or gross misbehavior?

The proposal was passed with a 72.45% approval.^[2]

Question VI

The sixth question was regarding the Judicial Service Commission:

Do you agree that the members of the Judicial Service Commission, who shall decide by a majority vote, the chairman having a casting vote in the event of an equality of votes, should be the Chief Justice as Chairman, the President or the most senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, the Attorney-General, the Chairman of the Public Service Commission, a member of the Law Society nominated by it, and a person of integrity and experience who is not a legal practitioner appointed by the President?

The proposal was passed with a 72.68% approval.^[2]

Question VII

The seventh question was regarding the Industrial Court:

Do you agree that the Industrial Court should be a superior court of record?

The proposal was passed with a 74.5% approval.^[2]

Question VIII

The eighth and last question was regarding the Chief Justice:

Do you agree that the Chief Justice be empowered to appoint a Rules of Court Advisory Committee to advise him on the review of the rules of practice and procedure of the High Court?

The proposal was passed with a 76.68% approval, the highest of all the proposals.^[2]

References

Elections and referendums in Botswana
General elections	1921 1924 1927 1930 1933 1936 1939 1942 1945 1948 1951 1954 1957 1961 1965 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014
Local elections	1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009
Referendums	1987 1997 2001