Winkelman v. Parma City School District
Winkelman v. Parma City School District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued February 27, 2007 Decided May 21, 2007 | |||||||
Full case name | Jacob Winkelman, a Minor, By and Through His Parents and Legal Guardians, Jeff and Sandee Winkelman, et al., Petitioners v. Parma City School District | ||||||
Citations |
127 S. Ct. 1994; 167 L. Ed. 2d 904; 2007 U.S. LEXIS 5902; 75 U.S.L.W. 4329; 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 287 | ||||||
Prior history | Judgment for Defendants, N.D. Ohio; appeal dismissed, No. 05–3886, 6th Cir., Nov. 4, 2005; cert. granted, 549 U.S. ___ (2006) | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
Parents can file suits under IDEA pro se because they are vindicating parental rights, rather than simply enforcing the rights of their children. Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Alito, Stevens, Souter, Breyer, Ginsburg | ||||||
Concur/dissent | Scalia, joined by Thomas | ||||||
Laws applied | |||||||
20 U.S.C. § 1400(d)(1)(A) |
Winkelman v. Parma City School District, 550 U.S. 516 (2007), is a civil suit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. Justice Kennedy held for the seven-justice majority that parents may file suit under IDEA pro se. Justice Kennedy declined to reach the question whether parents may represent the interests of their children pro se, instead concluding that IDEA created a set of independently enforceable rights in parents.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 7/18/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.