Voisine v. United States
Voisine v. United States | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued February 29, 2016 Decided June 27, 2016 | |||||||
Full case name | Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong III, Petitioners v. United States | ||||||
Docket nos. | 14–10154 | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
Reckless misdemeanor domestic violence convictions trigger gun control prohibitions on gun ownership. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Kagan, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito | ||||||
Dissent | Thomas, joined by Sotomayor (parts I, II) |
Voisine v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that reckless misdemeanor domestic violence convictions trigger gun control prohibitions on gun ownership.[1][2][3]
Background
In 2009, an anonymous caller in Maine notified officials that a bald eagle had been shot in Kingman.[4] Investigating officers discovered the primary suspect, Stephen L. Voisine, was not legally permitted to possess a firearm. [4] His prior domestic violence conviction barred him from possessing a gun, resulting from the Lautenberg Amendment signed into law in 1996.[5] During Voisine's interrogation, he admitted to shooting the eagle. Subsequently, officials discovered his 28-year criminal record included 14 convictions for assault and domestic violence. [4]
Voisine joined William Armstrong III to argue that their "reckless" domestic violence convictions should not have precluded them from owning guns in the first place.[5][6]
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Elena Kagan authored the 6-2 majority opinion. Justices Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor were the dissenters.
References
- ↑ "How Bad Does Domestic Violence Have to Be Before You Can't Have a Gun?". 2016-02-22. Retrieved 2016-06-27.
- ↑ "Supreme Court Rules Domestic Abusers Can Lose Their Gun-Ownership Rights".
- ↑ Lopez, German (27 June 2016). "The Supreme Court quietly handed gun control advocates a small victory".
- 1 2 3 "How Bad Does Domestic Violence Have to Be Before You Can't Have a Gun?". 2016-02-22. Retrieved 2016-06-27.
- 1 2 "The Supreme Court Is Taking a Case That Could Let 'Unintentional' Domestic Abusers Own Guns". 2015-10-30. Retrieved 2016-06-27.
- ↑ Melissa Jeltsen Senior Reporter, The Huffington Post (2016-02-26). "Domestic Abusers Take Their Fight To Own Guns To The Supreme Court". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2016-06-27.
External links
- Slip opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court
- SCOTUSblog coverage