Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States
| Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Full case name | Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States |
| Citations |
11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 382; 3 L. Ed. 378 |
| Holding | |
| Congress may revive a law by conditioning its revival on certain inaction by the President. Such is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. | |
| Court membership | |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Johnson, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. art. I, ยง 8, cl. 3 | |
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States, 11 U.S. 382 (1813), involved a forfeiture statute that Congress passed with a condition. The 1809 trade prohibition against Great Britain was to be reinstated in 1810 unless the President declared, by proclamation, that Great Britain was no longer violating the neutrality of the United States. The defendant argued unsuccessfully that such a conditional law unconstitutionally delegated congressional legislative authority to the President. The Court unequivocally upheld "reviving the act...either expressly or conditionally, as their judgment should direct." Id. at 388.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.