R v Mavros

R v Mavros^[1] is an important case in South African law. It was heard in the Appellate Division in Bloemfontein in November 1920. Innes CJ, Solomon JA and Juta JA were the presiding officers.

Facts

The term "arson" in South African practice is used to denote the corresponding, but somewhat wider, crime of brandstichting, which is committed by a man who sets fire to his own house wrongfully, maliciously and with intent to injure or defraud another person. Mavros in the present case had been convicted of the crime of arson, in that he had wrongfully and maliciously set alight his own store with intent to burn it and defraud a certain insurance company of the money for which it had insured the store and its goods.

Judgment

Departing from the decision in R v Enslin^[2] the court held, on a point of law reserved, that the facts as alleged constituted the crime charged.

References

Case law

R v Enslin 2 AC 69.
R v Mavros 1921 AD 19.

Notes

↑ 1921 AD 19.
↑ 2 AC 69.

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 8/28/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.