Nanoprobing

Not to be confused with Nanoprobe_(device).

Nanoprobing is method of extracting device electrical parameters through the use of nanoscale tungsten wires, used primarily in the semiconductor industry. The characterization of individual devices is instrumental to engineers and integrated circuit designers during initial product development and debug. It is commonly utilized in device failure analysis laboratories to aid with yield enhancement, quality and reliability issues and customer returns. Commercially available nanoprobing systems are integrated into either a vacuum-based scanning electron microscope (SEM) or atomic force microscope (AFM). Nanoprobing systems that are based on AFM technology are referred to as Atomic Force nanoProbers (AFP).

Principles and operation

AFM based nanoprobers, enable up to eight probe tips to be scanned to generate high resolution AFM topography images, as well as Conductive AFM, Scanning Capacitance, and Electrostatic Force Microscopy images. Conductive AFM provides pico-amp resolution to identify and localize electrical failures such as shorts, opens, resistive contacts and leakage paths, enabling accurate probe positioning for current-voltage measurements. AFM based nanoprobers enable nanometer scale device defect localization and accurate transistor device characterization without the physical damage and electrical bias induced by high energy electron beam exposure.

A low magnification image of eight nanoprobes hovering over a device to be tested
A high magnification image of tungsten nanoprobes landed on a SRAM device.

For SEM based nanoprobers, the ultra-high resolution of the microscopes that house the nanoprobing system allow the operator to navigate the probe tips with precise movement, allowing the user to see exactly where the tips will be landed, in real time. Existing nanoprobe needles or “probe tips” have a typical end-point radius ranging from 5 to 35 nm.[1] The fine tips enable access to individual contacts nodes of modern IC transistors. Navigation of the probe tips in SEM based nanoprobers are typically controlled by precision piezoelectric manipulators. Typical systems have anywhere from 2 to 8 probe manipulators with high end tools having better than 5 nm of placement resolution in the X, Y & Z axes and a high accuracy sample stage for navigation of the sample under test.

Application and capabilities for semiconductor devices

Example of Id-Vd Measurements of an NMOS transistor. The plots are also known as "Family of Curves". Important parameters can be extracted, such as saturation current (Idsat) and leakage current (Ioff).
Example of Id-Vg Measurements of an NMOS transistor. The plots are also known as "Vt Curves", since it is often used to extract the threshold voltage (Vt), which defines an approximation of when a transistor is "on" and allows current to flow across the channel.

Common nanoprobing techniques include, but are not limited to:

Challenges

Common issues that arise:

References

  1. ↑ Toh, S. L.; Tan, P. K.; Goh, Y. W.; Hendarto, E.; Cai, J. L.; Tan, H.; Wang, Q. F.; Deng, Q.; Lam, J.; Hsia, L. C.; Mai, Z. H. (2008). "In-Depth Electrical Analysis to Reveal the Failure Mechanisms with Nanoprobing". IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability. 8 (2): 387. doi:10.1109/TDMR.2008.920300.
  2. ↑ Fukui, M.; Nara, Y.; Fuse, J. (2012). "Characteristics Variability Evaluation of Actual LSI Transistors with Nanoprobing". 2012 IEEE 21st Asian Test Symposium. p. 4. doi:10.1109/ATS.2012.80. ISBN 978-1-4673-4555-2.
  3. ↑ Toh, S. L.; Mai, Z. H.; Tan, P. K.; Hendarto, E.; Tan, H.; Wang, Q. F.; Cai, J. L.; Deng, Q.; Ng, T. H.; Goh, Y. W.; Lam, J.; Hsia, L. C. (2007). "Use of Nanoprobing as the Diagnostic Tool for Nanoscaled Devices". 2007 14th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. p. 53. doi:10.1109/IPFA.2007.4378057. ISBN 978-1-4244-1014-9.
  4. ↑ Hendarto, E.; Lin, H. B.; Toh, S. L.; Tan, P. K.; Goh, Y. W.; Mai, Z. H.; Lam, J. (2008). "Investigation of soft fail issue in sub-nanometer devices using nanoprobing technique". 2008 15th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. p. 1. doi:10.1109/IPFA.2008.4588174. ISBN 978-1-4244-2039-1.
  5. ↑ Lin, H. S.; Chang, W. T.; Chen, C. L.; Huang, T. H.; Chiang, V.; Chen, C. M. (2006). "A Study of Asymmetrical Behaviour in Advanced Nano SRAM Devices". 13th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. p. 63. doi:10.1109/IPFA.2006.250998. ISBN 1-4244-0205-0.
  6. ↑ Dickson, K.; Lange, G.; Erington, K.; Ybarra, J. (2011). "Electron Beam Absorbed Current as a means of locating metal defectivity on 45nm SOI technology". 18th IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA). p. 1. doi:10.1109/IPFA.2011.5992793. ISBN 978-1-4577-0159-7.
  7. ↑ Wen Pin Lin; Hsiu Ju Chang (2010). "Physical failure analysis cases by Electron Beam Absorbed Current & Electron Beam Induced Current detection on nano-probing SEM system". 2010 17th IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. p. 1. doi:10.1109/IPFA.2010.5532245. ISBN 978-1-4244-5596-6.
  8. ↑ Gong, Z.; Chen, B. K.; Liu, J.; Sun, Y. (2013). "Automated nanoprobing under scanning electron microscopy". 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. p. 1433. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630759. ISBN 978-1-4673-5643-5.

Nanoprobe Capacitance-Voltage Spectroscopy (NCVS) Localization of 32nm SOI SRAM Array Failure

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.