Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States
The Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued January 16–18, 1889 Decided May 19, 1890 | |||||||
Full case name | The Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al. v. United States; Romney et al. v. United States | ||||||
Citations |
10 S. Ct. 792; 34 L. Ed. 478; 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2199 | ||||||
Prior history | Edmunds-Tucker Act provisions authorizing disincorporation of LDS Church upheld in U.S. v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. 5 Utah 361, 15 P. 473 (Utah.Terr. 1887). Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Utah Territory | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
Congress has supreme authority over territories, including power to dissolve the LDS Church's corporation and seize its property. Under parens patriae principals, congress may redirect assets to charitable purposes within Utah Territory. Property was properly not transferred to church members because they were using it to further outlawed polygamy. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Bradley, joined by Miller, Harlan, Gray, Blatchford, Brewer | ||||||
Dissent | Fuller, joined by Lamar, Field | ||||||
Laws applied | |||||||
U.S. Const. amend. I; Edmunds-Tucker Act |
Mormonism and polygamy |
---|
Portrait of Ira Eldredge with his three wives: Nancy Black Eldredge, Hannah Mariah Savage Eldredge, and Helvig Marie Andersen Eldredge. |
Related articles |
Latter Day Saints portal Book |
The Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States, 136 U.S. 1 (1890) was a Supreme Court case that upheld the Edmunds–Tucker Act on May 19, 1890. Among other things, the act disincorporated The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church).
The LDS Church was represented by its chief counsel Franklin S. Richards and former congressman James Broadhead.[1]
The ruling in Late Corporation would have directed federal escheat of substantially all the property of the legally disincorporated LDS Church, which was estimated at $3 million. Following the decision, the U.S. Attorney for Utah Territory reported seizing only $381,812 in assets.[2] Real property, including LDS temples, was never seized, although the ruling authorized it. Within five months, the LDS Church officially discontinued the practice of plural marriage with the 1890 Manifesto. On October 25, 1893, a congressional resolution authorized the release of assets seized from the LDS Church because, "said church has discontinued the practice of polygamy and no longer encourages or gives countenance to any manner of practices in violation of law, or contrary to good morals or public policy."[3]
Chief Justice Fuller's dissent asserted that though Congress has the power to criminalize polygamy, "it is not authorized under the cover of that power to seize and confiscate the property of persons, individuals, or corporations, without office found, because they may have been guilty of criminal practices."[4]
See also
|
References
Notes
- ↑ Rothera, Evan (March 2016). "The Tenacious "Twin Relic": Republicans, Polygamy, and The Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States". Journal of Supreme Court History. Retrieved 4 September 2016.
- ↑ Paul G. Kauper & Stephen C. Ellis, "Religious Corporations and the Law," 71 Mich. L. Rev. (1972-1973), 1499, 1517. This figure includes seized stock and cash in bank accounts as well as $10,000 "credits due on sheep."
- ↑ Jt. Res 11., 53d Cong., 1st Sess., 28 Stat. 980
- ↑ 136 U.S. 67 (1890)
Further reading
- "Gospel Topics", LDS.org, LDS Church, retrieved 2014-10-22
|contribution=
ignored (help)
External links
- Works related to Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States at Wikisource
- U.S. Supreme Court Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v. United States, 136 U.S. 1 (1890).