Inter-regional Deputies Group

Soviet Union
This article is part of a series on the politics and government of the Soviet Union
Leadership Leaders President (list Vice President) Collective leadership State Council Presidential Council
Communist Party Congress Central Committee History General Secretary Politburo Secretariat Orgburo
Legislature Congress of Soviets (Central Executive Committee) Supreme Soviet Soviet of the Union Soviet of Nationalities Presidium Congress of People's Deputies Speaker 1989 Legislative election
Governance Constitution Official names 1924 1936 1977 Government Ministries State Committees Executive Officer Premiership Cabinets Council of People's Commissars Council of Ministers Cabinet of Ministers
Judiciary Law Supreme Court People's Court Procurator General
History 1917–27 Revolution Civil War 1927–53 World War II 1953–64 Khrushchev Thaw 1964–82 Era of Stagnation 1982–91 Dissolution
Ideology Soviet democracy Marxism–Leninism Leninism Stalinism Khrushchevism De-Stalinization
Society Economy Agriculture Consumer goods Five-Year Plan Kosygin reform New Economic Policy Science and technology Era of Stagnation Material balance planning Transport Culture Demographics Education Family Phraseology Religion Repression Censorship Censorship of images Great Purge Gulag system Collectivization Human rights Ideological repression Suppressed research Political abuse of psychiatry Political repression Population transfer Propaganda Red Terror
Other countries Atlas

The Inter-Regional Deputies' Group (Russian: Межрегиональная депутатская группа, МДГ) was the first legal parliamentary opposition in the Soviet Union, a fraction formed in 1989 within the 1st Congress of People's Deputies. It was the base of the formation of the Democratic Russia Election Bloc whose main political goal, suggested by Andrei Sakharov, was to remove the Communist Party from power, in particular to remove the declaration of its leading role from the constitution. The Inter-Regional Group operated until 1991. It was dissolved due to lack of the common constructive programme.^[1]

References