Alternatives to the Standard Model Higgs

Although the Higgs boson, as included in the Standard Model, is arguably the simplest method of achieving the Higgs mechanism, it is not without problems. Consequently, particle physicists have searched for alternative models which solve one or more of these problems, including the Higgs hierarchy problem and Quantum triviality.

Overview

In particle physics, elementary particles and forces give rise to the world around us. Physicists explain the behaviors of these particles and how they interact using the Standard Model—a widely accepted framework believed to explain most of the world we see around us.[1] Initially, when these models were being developed and tested, it seemed that the mathematics behind those models, which were satisfactory in areas already tested, would also forbid elementary particles from having any mass, which showed clearly that these initial models were incomplete. In 1964 three groups of physicists almost simultaneously released papers describing how masses could be given to these particles, using approaches known as symmetry breaking. This approach allowed the particles to obtain a mass, without breaking other parts of particle physics theory that were already believed reasonably correct. This idea became known as the Higgs mechanism, and later experiments confirmed that such a mechanism does exist—but they could not show exactly how it happens.

The simplest theory for how this effect takes place in nature, and the theory that became incorporated into the Standard Model, was that if one or more of a particular kind of "field" (known as a Higgs field) happened to permeate space, and if it could interact with elementary particles in a particular way, then this would give rise to a Higgs mechanism in nature. In the basic Standard Model there is one field and one related Higgs boson; in some extensions to the Standard Model there are multiple fields and multiple Higgs bosons.

In the years since the Higgs field and boson were proposed as a way to explain the origins of symmetry breaking, several alternatives have been proposed that suggest how a symmetry breaking mechanism could occur without requiring a Higgs field to exist. Models which do not include a Higgs field or a Higgs boson are known as Higgsless models. In these models, strongly interacting dynamics rather than an additional (Higgs) field produce the non-zero vacuum expectation value that breaks electroweak symmetry.

List of alternative models

A partial list of proposed alternatives to a Higgs field as a source for symmetry breaking includes:

See also

References

  1. Heath, Nick, The Cern tech that helped track down the God particle, TechRepublic, July 4, 2012
  2. Steven Weinberg (1976), "Implications of dynamical symmetry breaking", Physical Review, D13 (4): 974–996, Bibcode:1976PhRvD..13..974W, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.974.
    S. Weinberg (1979), "Implications of dynamical symmetry breaking: An addendum", Physical Review, D19 (4): 1277–1280, Bibcode:1979PhRvD..19.1277W, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.1277.
  3. Leonard Susskind (1979), "Dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Weinberg-Salam theory", Physical Review, D20 (10): 2619–2625, Bibcode:1979PhRvD..20.2619S, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.20.2619.
  4. Csaki, C.; Grojean, C.; Pilo, L.; Terning, J. (2004), "Towards a realistic model of Higgsless electroweak symmetry breaking", Physical Review Letters, 92 (10): 101802, arXiv:hep-ph/0308038Freely accessible, Bibcode:2004PhRvL..92j1802C, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.101802, PMID 15089195
  5. Csaki, C.; Grojean, C.; Pilo, L.; Terning, J.; Terning, John (2004), "Gauge theories on an interval: Unitarity without a Higgs", Physical Review D, 69 (5): 055006, arXiv:hep-ph/0305237Freely accessible, Bibcode:2004PhRvD..69e5006C, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.055006
  6. Calmet, X.; Deshpande, N. G.; He, X. G.; Hsu, S. D. H. (2008), "Invisible Higgs boson, continuous mass fields and unHiggs mechanism", Physical Review D, 79 (5): 055021, arXiv:0810.2155Freely accessible, Bibcode:2009PhRvD..79e5021C, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.055021
  7. Abbott, L. F.; Farhi, E. (1981), "Are the Weak Interactions Strong?", Physics Letters B, 101 (1–2): 69, Bibcode:1981PhLB..101...69A, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90492-5
  8. Speirs, Neil Alexander (1985), "Composite models of weak gauge bosons", Doctoral thesis, Durham University
  9. Montag, J. Lee (1992), "Spontaneously Broken Conformal Symmetry and the Standard Model"
  10. Pawlowski, M.; Raczka, R. (1994), "A Unified Conformal Model for Fundamental Interactions without Dynamical Higgs Field", Foundations of Physics, 24 (9): 1305–1327, arXiv:hep-th/9407137Freely accessible, Bibcode:1994FoPh...24.1305P, doi:10.1007/BF02148570
  11. Calmet, X. (2011), "Asymptotically safe weak interactions", Mod. Phys. Lett., A26 (21): 1571–1576, arXiv:1012.5529Freely accessible, Bibcode:2011MPLA...26.1571C, doi:10.1142/S0217732311035900
  12. Calmet, X. (2011), "An Alternative view on the electroweak interactions", Int.J.Mod.Phys., A26 (17): 2855–2864, arXiv:1008.3780Freely accessible, Bibcode:2011IJMPA..26.2855C, doi:10.1142/S0217751X11053699
  13. Codello, A.; Percacci, R. (2008), "Fixed Points of Nonlinear Sigma Models in d>2", Physics Letters B, 672 (3): 280–283, arXiv:0810.0715Freely accessible, Bibcode:2009PhLB..672..280C, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.01.032
  14. Bilson-Thompson, Sundance O.; Markopoulou, Fotini; Smolin, Lee (2007), "Quantum gravity and the standard model", Class. Quantum Grav., 24 (16): 3975–3993, arXiv:hep-th/0603022Freely accessible, Bibcode:2007CQGra..24.3975B, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/16/002.
  15. Goldfain, E. (2008), "Bifurcations and pattern formation in particle physics: An introductory study", EPL (Europhysics Letters), 82: 11001, Bibcode:2008EL.....8211001G, doi:10.1209/0295-5075/82/11001
  16. Goldfain (2010), "Non-equilibrium Dynamics as Source of Asymmetries in High Energy Physics" (PDF), Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics, 7 (24): 219
  17. Stancato, David; Terning, John (2008), "The Unhiggs", Journal of High Energy Physics, 2009 (11): 101, arXiv:0807.3961Freely accessible, Bibcode:2009JHEP...11..101S, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/11/101
  18. Falkowski, Adam; Perez-Victoria, Manuel (2009), "Electroweak Precision Observables and the Unhiggs", Journal of High Energy Physics, 2009 (12): 061, arXiv:0901.3777Freely accessible, Bibcode:2009JHEP...12..061F, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/12/061
  19. Zloshchastiev, Konstantin G. (2009), "Spontaneous symmetry breaking and mass generation as built-in phenomena in logarithmic nonlinear quantum theory", Acta Physica Polonica B, 42 (2): 261–292, arXiv:0912.4139Freely accessible, Bibcode:2011AcPPB..42..261Z, doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.42.261
  20. Avdeenkov, Alexander V.; Zloshchastiev, Konstantin G. (2011), "Quantum Bose liquids with logarithmic nonlinearity: Self-sustainability and emergence of spatial extent", Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 44 (19): 195303, arXiv:1108.0847Freely accessible, Bibcode:2011JPhB...44s5303A, doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/19/195303
  21. Dvali, Gia; Giudice, Gian F.; Gomez, Cesar; Kehagias, Alex (2011), "UV-Completion by Classicalization", Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011 (8): 108, arXiv:1010.1415Freely accessible, Bibcode:2011JHEP...08..108D, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2011)108

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/1/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.