Hans-Joachim Haase (optician)

Hans-Joachim Haase (1915 – December 20, 2001) was a German clockmaker, optician and inventor, who became known for an apparatus for testing binocular vision and for the MKH method, an alternative method intended to improve binocular vision using corrective lenses. This method, which is controversial, has mainly found application in German-speaking countries.

Life

Born the son of an optician, Haase underwent formal training to be a clockmaker and an optician, and became a Meister-optician in 1951.[1]

From 1953 onwards he held a teaching position at the Staatliche Fachschule für Optik und Fototechnik (SFOF) in Berlin.[1]

With an acute interest in binocular vision, Haase developed novel binocular vision testing methods based on the Turville infinity balance technique which had become known in Britain. He developed an apparatus for vision testing, which has since been built and sold by the Carl Zeiss company under the name Polatest.[1]

MKH method

Haase developed a method which is intended to improve binocular vision called the MKH method (short for: Mess- und Korrektionsmethodik nach H.-J. Haase), which has become known in German-speaking countries in particular.

The method consists in a measurement of an alleged angular misalignment (referred to as associated phoria or hidden strabismus, also called "Winkelfehlsichtigkeit" in German language) that is different from heterotropia or heterophoria, and involves the use of prisms for its correction. In the MKH method, this alleged misalignment is assessed by the Polatest apparatus and subsequently the patient is instructed to use prism glasses in daily life to correct for the alleged misalignment, with the prism glasses made according to the Polatest results. The MKH method claims to reduce eye strain-related symptoms. It has found some application in German-speaking countries and claims to achieve unimpaired binocular vision,[2][3] however it has received little scientific recognition and is not accepted by mainstream medical practice, neither internationally nor in Germany.[4][5] The method does not appear to show better results than conventional spectacle prescriptions,[6] and the practice of MKH has been criticized as contravening the rule to first do no harm.[7] The German association of ophthalmologists (Berufsverband der Augenärzte Deutschlands (BVA)) issued a statement warning that the use of the MKH method could in fact lead to use of prisms of increasing strength, ultimately requiring the patient to undergo strabismus surgery that would have otherwise been unnecessary.[8]

It is to be noted that the vision therapy approach that is widespread in the U.S. and which has led to recover stereopsis in a number of persons, most notably Susan R. Barry, is diametrically opposed to the use of prisms in the manner that is advocated in the MKH method. In particular, Frederick W. Brock spoke against the use of an amblyoscope during training, because in his view the patient needed to take the correct binocular posture (aiming the two eyes such that they simultaneously look at the same target in space) when fusing, otherwise the training would not be likely to succeed.[9]

In any case, tentative studies have been undertaken whether some synergy can be found between the U.S. approach to vision therapy and the German approach of MKH.[10]

Awards

Haase received the following awards:[11][12]

The International Association for Binocular Vision (Internationale Vereinigung für Binokulares Sehen, IVBS) was created to further advance his MKH method.[13] The association created a prize in his name that can be awarded since 2003.[14]

Publications

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Hans-Joachim Haase". Internationale Vereinigung für Binokulares Sehen (IVBS). Retrieved 2015-04-12.
  2. ↑ "Information in English". Internationale Vereinigung für Binokulares Sehen (IVBS). Retrieved 2013-07-24.
  3. ↑ Niesel, P.; Stieger, E. (April 1980). "The Pola-test in asthenopia". Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde (in German). 176 (4). pp. 572–576. PMID 7421032.
  4. ↑ Kromeier, M.; Schmitt, C.; Bach, M.; Kommerell, G. (2002). "Do prisms according to Hans-Joachim Haase improve stereoacuity?". Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde (English abstract) (in German). 219 (6): 422–8. doi:10.1055/s-2002-32883. PMID 12136437.
  5. ↑ Schroth, V.; Jaschinski, W. (2007). "Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?". Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde (English abstract) (in German). 224 (1): 32–9. doi:10.1055/s-2006-927268. PMID 17260317.
  6. ↑ Kommerell, G.; Kromeier, M. (January 2002). "Prism correction in heterophoria". Ophthalmologie (in German). 99 (1). pp. 3–9. PMID 11840793.
  7. ↑ Brügger, N.; Champion, R.; Flury-Cornelis, H.; Payer, G.; Payer, H.; Siegenthaler, B.; Starkermann, M.; Weisstanner, B. (April 1995). "Wie notwendig sind Prismen? Verzicht auf Polatest-induziert fehlapplizierte Prismenbrillen in mehr als 70 Fällen". Spektrum der Augenheilkunde (in German). 9 (2). pp. 63–73. doi:10.1007/bf03163758.
  8. ↑ "Wenn die Brille krank macht...." (in German). Berufsverband der Augenärzte Deutschlands e.V. (BVA). 30 March 2001. Retrieved 2013-07-24.
  9. ↑ Barry, Susan R. (2011). "The work and wisdom of Dr. Frederick W. Brock" (PDF). Journal of Behavioral Optometry. 22 (3). pp. 59–63.
  10. ↑ "Synergieeffekt von Optometrie und Visualtraining mit Preis gewürdigt" (in German). Wissenschaftliche Vereinigung für Augenoptik und Optometrie (WVAO). Retrieved 2013-07-24.
  11. ↑ "Ehrenmitglied Hans-Joachim Haase verstorben" (in German). Wissenschaftliche Vereinigung für Augenoptik und Optometrie (WVAO). Retrieved 2015-04-12.
  12. ↑ "In Memorian Hans-Joachim Haase". www.euro-focus.de. Retrieved 2015-04-12.
  13. ↑ "IVBS (English-language information)". Retrieved 2015-04-12.
  14. ↑ "Der Hans-Joachim-Haase-Preis" (in German). Retrieved 2015-04-12.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/16/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.