Halliday Sutherland

Halliday Gibson Sutherland (1882–1960) was a British physician and author.

Early life

Halliday Sutherland was born in Glasgow, Scotland on 24 June 1882. He was educated at High School of Glasgow and Merchiston Castle School. Shortly after the First World War he became a Roman Catholic. In 1920 he married Muriel Fitzpatrick. They lived at 5 Stafford Terrace Kensington in London and had six children. He died aged 77 in the Hospital of St John and St Elizabeth, St Marylebone, London on 19 April 1960.[1]

Career

Sutherland graduated from Edinburgh University with a MB, Ch B in 1906 and MD with honours in 1908. Following graduation he worked closely with Robert William Philip (later "Sir"), described as a "pioneer of modern anti-tuberculosis schemes". In 1911, Sutherland founded a tuberculosis clinic and an open-air school in the bandstand of Regent's Park in London and produced "The Story of John M'Neil", thought to be Britain's first cinema film on health education.[2][3] During the First World War, Sutherland served in the Royal Navy (including service on RMS Empress of Britain) and in the Royal Air Force.[2]

After the War he held the following posts:[4]

Sutherland was President of the Tuberculosis Society of Great Britain and an honorary physician to, and council member of, the Queen Alexandra Sanatorium Fund.[1]

In 1954 he was made a Knight Commander of the Order of Isabel the Catholic and awarded the Pope John XXI Medal in 1955.[4][5]

Books

Sutherland was a writer of books and articles. His major works were:[4]

The Arches of the Years was Sutherland's most successful book. It was a best-seller for 1933,[6] ran to 35 editions in English, and was translated into eight languages.[1] G.K. Chesterton described Sutherland's writing as follows: "Dr. Halliday Sutherland is a born writer, especially a born story-teller. Dr. Sutherland, who is distinguished in medicine, is an amateur in the sense that he only writes when he has nothing better to do. But when he does, it could hardly be done better."[7]

Irish Journey includes an account of Dr Sutherland's visit to the Magdalene Laundry in Galway in April 1955. To visit this institution, Sutherland needed the permission of Michael Browne, the Bishop of Galway.[8] Permission was granted, on condition that Sutherland allowed his account to be censored by the Mother Superior of the Sisters of Mercy, who ran the institution.[9] Accordingly, the account of his visit to the Laundry in "Irish Journey" was censored. In 2013, the publishers draft of "Irish Journey" was discovered in a cellar and the uncensored version was published in "The Suitcase in the Cellar" on hallidaysutherland.com.[10]

Public opposition of eugenics, Malthusianism and disputes with Marie Stopes

Sutherland publicly opposed the doctrines of eugenics and Malthusianism, which were then more fashionable than they are today. This brought him into a bitter and public dispute with Dr Marie Stopes.

Eugenics

In the main, eugenists agreed with the sentiments of Dr John Haycraft who, in an 1894 speech on "Darwinism and Race Progress" at the Royal College of Physicians, had said the "preventative medicine is trying a unique experiment, and the effect is already discernible – race decay".[11] The argument was that providing medical attention to those who would have perished in previous eras ran in the face of "the survival of the fittest". Race decay would surely result as the unfit, given succour, would live long enough to propagate their genes.

The first evidence of Sutherland opposing eugenists was in his article: "The Seed or the Soil in Tuberculosis".[12] The article as written in response to a lecture "Tuberculosis, Heredity and Environment" given by Karl Pearson on 12 March 1912 at the Galton Laboratory for National Eugenics.

At the beginning of his lecture, Pearson said that the stated that the "importance of the discovery of Koch [of the tubercle bacillus] cannot be overrated," but he went on to say that this had led to a focus on infection as the cause of tuberculosis. His view was that there should have been a proper scientific inquiry as to the relative importance of the hereditary and environmental factors and of the liability to infection in the cause of the disease.[13] Pearson had previously asserted that "the influence of environment is not one-fifth of heredity, and quite possibly not one-tenth of it,"[14] so he felt that by focussing on infection, the most significant cause was being ignored. Pearson provided statistics to back up his assertions. Towards the end of his lecture, Pearson moved away from science to the political action that should be taken as a result of his findings:

"But Eugenists have something better to propose. No one can study the pedigrees of pathological states, insanity, mental defect, albinism, &c., collected by our laboratory, without being struck by the large proportion of tuberculous members – occasionally the tuberculous man is a brilliant member of our race – but the bulk of the tuberculous belong to stocks which we want ab initio to discourage. Everything which tends to check the multiplication of the unfit, to emphasize that the fertility of the physically and mentally healthy, will pro tanto aid Nature’s method of reducing the phthisical death-rate. That is what the Eugenist proclaims as the “better thing to do”, and £1,500,000 spent in encouraging healthy parentage would do more than the establishment of a sanatorium in every township."[15]

In "The Seed or the Soil in Tuberculosis," Sutherland rebutted Pearson's assertions and provided statistics to support his assertions. At this stage, In the British Medical Journal, disagreement was on the grounds of statistics and science. By 1917, Sutherland opposed eugenics was on ethical grounds as well.

On Tuesday, 4 September 1917 Sutherland addressed the National Council of the Y.M.C.A. on "Consumption: Its Cause and Cure". He said that while "modern medicine [has]…found the cause, sources and cure of this disease", he identified that the barriers to its prevention were man-made. The obstacles were apathy, arrogance, ignorance, indifference, and eugenics.[16]

"But why should you set out to prevent this infection and to cure the disease? There are some self-styled eugenists – whom you sir, from your pulpit have castigated as race-breeders with the soul of cattle-breeders – who declaim that the prevention of disease is not in itself a good thing. They say the efficiency of the State is based upon what they call 'the survival of the fittest'. This war has smashed their rhetorical phrase. Who now talks about the survival of the fittest, or thinks himself fit because he survives? I don't know what they mean. I do know that in preventing disease you are not preserving the weak, but conserving the strong. And I do know that those evil conditions which will kill a child within a few months of birth, and slay another when he reaches the teens, will destroy yet another when he comes to adult life."[17]

Stopes had met Sir Francis Galton when a child[18] and had been interested in eugenics at least since 1912 when she joined the Eugenics Education Society[19] (she became a life fellow in 1921).[20] In 1921, she founded the "Society for Constructive Birth Control and Racial Progress", in part because she was "annoyed that the (Eugenics Education) Society refused to place birth control prominently on its platform".[19] The aim of the society was to "promote eugenic birth control". At the time the issues of birth control and eugenics were closely related: one historian has written: "in the interwar years birth control and eugenics were so intertwined as to be synonymous".[19] Stopes stated the eugenic purpose of her clinic on the second day of the Stopes v. Sutherland libel trial in 1923. Under oath, she explained the purpose of the society that had been set up to run the clinic:

“The object of the Society is, if possible, to counteract the steady evil which has been growing for a good many years of the reduction of the birth rate just on the part of the thrifty, wise, well-contented, and the generally sound members of our community, and the reckless breeding from the C.3 end, and the semi-feebleminded, the careless, who are proportionately increasing in our community because of the slowing of the birth rate at the other end of the social scale. Statistics show that every year the birth rate from the worst end of our community is increasing in proportion to the birth rate at the better end, and it was in order to try to right that grave social danger that I embarked upon this work.”[21]

Stopes outlined her eugenic vision in the final chapter of Radiant Motherhood: A Book for those Who Are Creating the Future, published in 1920. She outlined her "ardent dream" of "human stock represented only by well-formed, desired and well-endowed beautiful men and women". An obstacle to its accomplishment was "inborn incapacity" which lay "in the vast and ever increasing stock of degenerate, feeble-minded, and unbalanced who are now in our midst", a class of people who were "appallingly prolific". The solution was "a few very simple Acts of Parliament" for the compulsory sterilisation of "the miserable, the degenerate [and] the utterly wretched in mind and body".[22] In March 1921, Stopes opened her birth control clinic in the east-end of London.[20]

Malthusianism

In 1922 Sutherland wrote Birth Control: A Statement of Christian Doctrine Against the Neo Malthusians in which he attacked "the essential fallacies of Malthusian teaching". He said there was "no evidence whatever to prove that the population is pressing on the soil. On the contrary, we find ample physical resources sufficient to support the entire population, and we also find evidence of human injustice, incapacity, and corruption sufficient to account for the poverty and misery that exist in these countries". Sutherland argued that "organised poverty" arose when in the sixteenth century "the greater part of the land, including common land belonging to the poor, had been seized by the rich" and the Parliamentary Acts for the enclosure of common land between 1714 and 1820.[23]

Disputes with Marie Stopes

Birth Control is remembered today as the work that contained the passages that Stopes asserted were defamatory, which led to the Stopes v. Sutherland case.

Sutherland reproduced a letter Stopes had written (as President of the Society for Constructive Birth Control and Racial Progress) to the Sussex Daily News and which had appeared in the paper on 17 November. Stopes had written:

"That there may be medical men who do not approve of birth control is natural when one remembers that a doctor has to make his living, and can do so more easily when women are ailing with incessant pregnancies than when they maintain themselves in good health by only having children when fitted to do so. Opinions of medicals, therefore must be sifted. The best doctors are with us; the self-seeking and the biased may be against us."[23]

Sutherland wrote that this was a "malignant attack" on the medical profession.[23] In the second instance, under the headings "Specially Hurtful to the Poor" and "Exposing the Poor to Experiment", Sutherland wrote:

"In the midst of a London slum a woman, who is a doctor of German philosophy (Munich), has opened a Birth Control Clinic, where working women are instructed in a method of contraception described by Professor McIlroy as 'The most harmful method of which I have had experience'. When we remember that millions are being spent by the Ministry of Health and by Local Authorities – on pure milk for necessitous expectant and nursing mothers, on Maternity Clinics to guard the health of mothers before and after childbirth, for the provision of skilled midwives, and on Infant Welfare Centres – it is truly amazing that this monstrous campaign of birth control should be tolerated by the Home Secretary. Charles Bradlaugh was condemned to jail for a less serious crime."[23]

The paragraph echoes one in Chapter XX of "Radiant Motherhood" in which Stopes criticised the ability of doctors and social reforms to improve the health of the population:

"Doctors may cure every disease known to humanity, but while they are so doing, fresh diseases, further modifications of destructive germs, may spring into existence, the possibility of which has been demonstrated by French Scientists.

"Prisons and reformatories, municipal milk, the feeding of school children, improvement in housing, reform of our marriage laws, schools for mothers, even schools for fathers, garden cities—not all of these useful and necessary things together and many more added to them will ever touch the really profound sources of our race, will ever cause freedom from degeneracy and ill health, will ever create that fine, glorious, and beautiful race of men and women which hovers in the dreams of our reformers. Is then this dream out of reach and impossible; are then all our efforts wasted? No the dream is not impossible of fulfilment; but, at present, our efforts are almost entirely wasted because they are built on the shifting sand and not upon the steady rock."[24]

Charles Bradlaugh (and Annie Besant) had been tried in 1877 for publishing 'obscene literature'. They had published an American Malthusian tract in Britain. The original document was The Fruits of Philosophy which "advocated and gave explicit information about contraceptive methods". For the British version, Bradlaugh and Besant had added a subtitle: An Essay on the Population Question and a preface "we believe, with the Rev. Mr. Malthus, that population has a tendency to increase faster than the means of existence, and that some checks must therefore exercise control over population".[19]

Stopes sued Sutherland for libel and the case commenced in the High Court on 21 February 1923. The defendants (Sutherland and his publisher) won. Stopes appealed, won, and was awarded damages of one hundred pounds. Sutherland appealed to the House of Lords and the case was heard for the third time on 21 November 1924. Sutherland won. Stopes was ordered to repay the one hundred pounds arising from the previous hearing, and to pay the defendant's costs in relation to the appeals to the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords.[18]

A second case arose when, in January 1929, Stopes publication Birth Control News attacked Sutherland and this time it was he who took legal action against her for libel. He lost in the Court of Appeal.[18]

References

  1. 1 2 3 British Medical Journal, Obituary Halliday G Sutherland, M.D. 30 April 1960 pages 1368–9
  2. 1 2 Harley Williams, 'Sutherland, Halliday Gibson (1882–1960)',rev.Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004. http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/36372,accessed 24 January 2014
  3. ↑ British Film Institute http://collections-search.bfi.org.uk/web/Details/ChoiceFilmWorks/150026759 viewed on 11 August 2014
  4. 1 2 3 Harley Williams, 'Sutherland, Halliday Gibson (1882–1960)',rev.Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004. http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/36372,accessed 24 January 2014
  5. ↑ British Medical Journal, Obituary Halliday G Sutherland, M.D. 30 April 1960 pages 1368–9
  6. ↑ Michael Korda, Making the List: A Cultural History of the American Bestseller 1900–1999, Barnes and Noble 2001. ISBN 0-7607-2559-4.
  7. ↑ "Documents of the Twentieth Century" by G. K. Chesterton "The Listener" 12 December 1934.
  8. ↑ Coogan, T.P. Ireland Since The Rising, Pall Mall Press, 1966, p. 239.
  9. ↑ Halliday Sutherland, Irish Journey, G. Bles, 1956 ISBN 7470000100, 9787470000105
  10. ↑ www.hallidaysutherland.com The Suitcase in the Cellar
  11. ↑ Peoplequake by Fred Pearce, Transworld Publishers 2010. Version 1.0 Epub ISBN 9781409094227
  12. ↑ "The Seed or the Soil in Tuberculosis" by Halliday Sutherland British Medical Journal. 1912 Nov 23; 2(2708): 1434–1437
  13. ↑ Tuberculosis, Heredity and Environment being a lecture by Karl Pearson, F.R.S. at the Galton laboratory for National Eugenics on 12 March 1912. Page 1. See: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/77020#page/5/mode/1up
  14. ↑ "Nature and Nurture: The Problem of the Future". A Presidential Address delivered by Karl Pearson, F.R.S. at the Annual General Meeting of the Social and Political Education League 28 April 1910.
  15. ↑ Tuberculosis, Heredity and Environment being a lecture by Karl Pearson, F.R.S. at the Galton laboratory for National Eugenics on 12 March 1912. Page 45. See: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/77020#page/5/mode/1up
  16. ↑ "Consumption: Its Cause and Cure" An Address by Dr Halliday Sutherland on 4 September 1917, published by the Red Triangle Press.
  17. ↑ "Consumption: Its Cause and Cure" An Address by Dr Halliday Sutherland on 4 September 1917, published by the Red Triangle Press.
  18. 1 2 3 June Rose, Marie Stopes and the Sexual Revolution Faber and Faber London 1992
  19. 1 2 3 4 Jane Carey, The Racial Imperatives of Sex: Birth Control and Eugenics in Britain, the United States and Australia in the Interwar Years Women's History Review 21, no.5(2012): 753–552 Monash University
  20. 1 2 http://www.galtoninstitute.org.uk/Newsletters/GINL9603/social_context.htm viewed 27 January 2014
  21. ↑ Box, M. (Ed.). (1967). The Trial of Marie Stopes. London: Femina Books Ltd. Page 76.
  22. ↑ Marie Carmichael Stopes Radiant Motherhood. A book for those who are creating the future G.P. Putnam's Sons, New York, London. The Knickerbocker Press 1921. Chapter XX The Creation of a New and Irradiated Race, pages 233–252.
  23. 1 2 3 4 Halliday Sutherland, Birth Control: A Statement of Christian Doctrine against the Neo-Malthusians New York, PJ Kennedy and Sons, 1922.
  24. ↑ Marie Carmichael Stopes Radiant Motherhood. A book for those who are creating the future G.P. Putnam's Sons, New York, London. The Knickerbocker Press 1921. Chapter XX The Creation of a New and Irradiated Race, pages 233–252.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/9/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.