Ex parte Lundgren
This article is about the ex parte decision. For other uses, see Carl Lundgren (disambiguation).
Ex parte Lundgren is a decision by the United States Patent and Trademark Office board of appeals, i.e. the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI), that asserts that process inventions do not have to be in the technological arts in order to be patentable in the United States. They do, however, have to produce a "concrete, useful and tangible result". Lundgren was then superseded by In re Bilski, which jettisoned the "concrete, useful and tangible result" test.
See also
- Business method patent
- Ex Parte Bowman
- Diamond v. Diehr
- Freeman-Walter-Abele Test
- State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 8/29/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.