Clique graph
In graph theory, a clique graph of an undirected graph G is another graph K(G) that represents the structure of cliques in G.
Clique graphs were discussed at least as early as 1968,[1] and a characterization of clique graphs was given in 1971.[2]
Formal definition
A clique of a graph G is a set X of vertices of G with the property that every pair of distinct vertices in X are adjacent in G. A maximal clique of a graph G is a clique X of vertices of G, such that there is no clique Y of vertices of G that contains all of X and at least one other vertex.
Given a graph G, its clique graph K(G) is a graph such that
- every vertex of K(G) represents a maximal clique of G; and
- two vertices of K(G) are adjacent when the underlying cliques in G share at least one vertex in common.
The clique graph K(G) can also be characterized as the intersection graph of the maximal cliques of G.[3]
Characterization
A graph H is the clique graph K(G) of another graph if and only if there exists a collection C of cliques in H whose union covers all the edges of H, such that C forms a Helly family. This means that, if S is a subset of C with the property that every two members of S have a non-empty intersection, then S itself should also have a non-empty intersection. However, the cliques in C do not necessarily have to be maximal cliques.[2]
When H =K(G), a family C of this type may be constructed in which each clique in C corresponds to a vertex v in G, and consists of the cliques in G that contain v. These cliques all have v in their intersection, so they form a clique in H. The family C constructed in this way has the Helly property, because any subfamily of C with pairwise nonempty intersections must correspond to a clique in G, which can be extended to a maximal clique that belongs to the intersection of the subfamily.[2]
Conversely, when H has a Helly family C of its cliques, covering all edges of H, then it is the clique graph K(G) for a graph G whose vertices are the disjoint union of the vertices of H and the elements of C. This graph G has an edge for each pair of cliques in C with nonempty intersection, and for each pair of a vertex of H and a clique in C that contains it. However, it does not contain any edges connecting pairs of vertices in H. The maximal cliques in this graph G each consist of one vertex of H together with all the cliques in C that contain it, and their intersection graph is isomorphic to H.[2]
However, this characterization does not lead to efficient algorithms: the problem of recognizing whether a given graph is a clique graph is NP-complete.[4]
References
- ↑ Hamelink, Ronald C. (1968). "A partial characterization of clique graphs". Journal of Combinatorial Theory. 5: 192–197. doi:10.1016/S0021-9800(68)80055-9.
- 1 2 3 4 Roberts, Fred S.; Spencer, Joel H. (1971). "A characterization of clique graphs". Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series B. 10: 102–108. doi:10.1016/0095-8956(71)90070-0.
- ↑ Szwarcfiter, Jayme L.; Bornstein, Claudson F. (1994). "Clique graphs of chordal and path graphs". SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics. 7: 331–336. doi:10.1137/S0895480191223191.
- ↑ Alcón, Liliana; Faria, Luerbio; de Figueiredo, Celina M. H.; Gutierrez, Marisa (2009). "The complexity of clique graph recognition". Theoretical Computer Science. 410 (21-23): 2072–2083. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2009.01.018. MR 2519298.