Beth definability

In mathematical logic, Beth definability is a result that connects implicit definability of a property to its explicit definability, specifically the theorem states that the two senses of definability are equivalent.

Statement

The theorem states that, given any two models A and B of a first-order theory T in the language L' ⊇ L such that A|L = B|L (where A|L is the reduct of A to L), it is the case that A ⊨ φ[a] if and only if B ⊨ φ[a] (for φ a formula in L' and for all tuples a of A) only if it is also the case that φ is equivalent modulo T to a formula ψ in L. Less formally: a property is implicitly definable in a theory in language L (via introduction of a new symbol φ of an extended language L') only if that property is explicitly definable in that theory (by formula ψ in the original language L).

Clearly the converse holds as well, so that we have an equivalence between implicit and explicit definability. That is, a "property" is implicitly definable with respect to a theory if and only if it is explicitly definable.

The theorem does not hold if the condition is restricted to finite models. We may have A ⊨ φ[a] if and only if B ⊨ φ[a] for all pairs A,B of finite models without there being any L-formula ψ equivalent to φ modulo T.

The result was first proven by Evert Willem Beth.

Sources

• Hodges W. A Shorter Model Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1997.